Eating Hudson River Stripers - Forums
Striped Bass Fishing Site Map | Contact Us | Fishing Log Software | Fishing Online | Advertise
to UPLOAD: please register or login

Go Back Forums > East Coast Regional Forums > Hudson River
Forgot Password? Register Now!!

Hudson River The mighty Hudson River reports information and Discussion

Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2006, 09:55 AM
luckey115 luckey115 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16
Default Eating Hudson River Stripers

So, do any of you eat your catch from the river? Is it "safe"?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-03-2006, 10:36 AM
mrbuster mrbuster is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 272

Maybe one or two, but thats it. I think it's recommended that only one a year is eaten. I could be mistaken on that. But I did read something somewhere on your question.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 01:23 PM
Striperjim's Avatar
Striperjim Striperjim is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 4,316

Dont eat too many!! borg.gif
Heres a list of area advisories.
The second link has some important info on how to lesson the
contaminents when cleaning the fish before cooking.
Fish store the contaminants in fatty tissue. The smaller fish
are younger and better to eat especially for younger
children and pregnant women.
Your liver can handle one fish a month.
Consumption advisory thread

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-03-2006, 03:10 PM
luckey115 luckey115 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16

Thanks guys! I appreciate the feedback.

Basically, I just want to be able to have a nice, boastful BBQ/Cookout if I catch a decent-sized striper this year. I don't eat much seafood as it is right now, so, it doesn't look too dangerous to have just one fish. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't gonna glow in the dark or anything like that, know what I mean?
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2006, 07:53 PM
UpstateEddie UpstateEddie is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 29

Who does know the truth on this issue? In an issue of Bass Master's an author states, rather matter of factly, that the standard for the amount mercury you might eat is set 10 times higher than what fish are found to actually contain. All in the interest of erring on the side of caution for the public's good. That the tests assume a person eats some outrageous quantity of fish, fatty parts and all. What actual cleaned fillets have in mercury I have no idea, nor have I ever seen it talked about. Like one gent said, "I don't eat that much seafood anyway." Like lots of us....after a while every meal being similar, it looks like the one before it. I had a college roomate off a dairy farm....he couldn't look a steak in the face....he'd rather have pizza.
ed in schenectady
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 10:44 PM
firenfish firenfish is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default mmmmmm!

fillet them,cut them into bite size chunks,deap fry them in a fryer and then dip them into a mixture of ketchup and hot horseradish, you can't beat them!!!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 04:33 PM
CaptainMorgan!'s Avatar
CaptainMorgan! CaptainMorgan! is offline
Reports and Info Dude
Got a Little Captain in you?
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,619
Default Despite Warnings, Many Persist in Eating Fish From the Hudso

Despite Warnings, Many Persist in Eating Fish From the Hudson
By Anahad O?Connor
Published: August 19, 2006 New York Times

On a recent cloudless afternoon, Croton Point Park seemed to be a fishing paradise. The tide was low; the breeze was soft. Families picnicked and people stood along the shore with fishing rods, casting out into the Hudson in hopes of catching and carrying away one of the river?s coveted bluefish or striped bass.
The only problem ? though it was invisible ? was in the fish themselves.
?We?ve been coming here to get our fish for many years, and it?s been great,? said Miguel Tejada, holding a sleek fishing rod in his hands as his wife and two small children looked on. ?I have heard people say that you should not eat the fish here too much, that the fish are not safe. But I?m not really worried.?
For years, state health officials have warned that because of mercury and PCB contamination, women of childbearing age and children under 15 should not eat any fish from the Hudson River, and other people should do so only sparingly. Studies and surveys have nonetheless found that many people are either unaware of those warnings or, like Mr. Tejada, simply ignore them.
But scientists are finding that the consequences for those who turn a blind eye are hard to overlook. An examination of 124 anglers at a half-dozen piers and fishing clubs along the lower Hudson River found that those who reported eating locally caught fish ? about 80 percent of the group ? had about twice as much mercury in their blood as the others, according to a recently released study.
That report is the first to document the levels of mercury in anglers who regularly get their meals from the lower Hudson, which the health department defines as south from the Rip Van Winkle Bridge near the town of Catskill. The study found that those who did so had an average of 2.2 nanograms per milliliter of mercury in their systems. That level is below the safe baseline of 5.8 nanograms per milliliter recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency, but still worrisome to scientists who say the health effects of long-term exposure to those levels of mercury are not well understood.
The report, by a team of researchers at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, was published in the June issue of the journal Environmental Research.
?This was an eye-opener for us,? said Anne L. Golden, an assistant professor in the Department of Community and Preventive Medicine who was involved in the study. ?The knowledge level was high, but people were taking educated risks. They were still eating the fish they caught, and in quantities that definitely exceeded the recommended limits.?
The study showed that most anglers, including those who never eat local fish, shared their catches with family, friends and acquaintances. Perhaps most alarming was that nearly 40 percent said they gave locally caught fish to women of childbearing age. That is something scientists have warned against, because mercury and PCB can be stored in the body and passed on to children during pregnancy or while nursing.
When exposed to levels of mercury above the federal limit ? and possibly even below it, some scientists argue ? a fetus or an infant can suffer neurological damage.
Since many people who eat local fish have at least some knowledge of the warnings, scientists and health officials have struggled to understand why so many people risk their health.
The explanation may have something to do with the invisible nature of the threat, said Edward Horn, a senior scientist with the State Department of Health. People see the water, which looks clean; they see the fish, which look healthy, he said, so they think there is no danger.
?Any harm from eating the fish is not obvious,? Dr. Horn added. ?In other words, people don?t get sick the next day. It?s not the kind of harm that is easily linked to what they do.?
Mercury is released into the atmosphere largely by coal-fired power plants and by solid-waste incinerators. In the form of methylmercury, it drifts into lakes and rivers, where it is absorbed by fish and shellfish and gradually passed up the food chain.
Two of the types of fish in the Hudson that accumulate the highest concentrations of mercury, striped bass and bluefish, are also among the most popular among local anglers, surveys find. In detailed advisories over the years, the state has been warning most adults to eat those fish and others from the Hudson no more than once a month.
But getting the word out has not been easy. For a long time, one way the state distributed the warning was by including it in the packet that anglers receive when they buy fishing licenses. But a license is not required to fish the waters of the lower Hudson River, so many anglers never receive those pamphlets.
?The further south you go down the Hudson, the more anglers you find without licenses,? Dr. Horn said.
The hurdles are also cultural. In Harlem and other popular fishing spots along the southern end of the Hudson, experts say, some of the anglers come from impoverished homes where it is more feasible to pull fish from the river than to buy them. Others are immigrants from the Caribbean and Central America, who say that fishing for food has always been a way of life for them.
Mr. Tejada, who lives in Tarrytown and is from Guatemala, regularly fishes at Croton Point Park. He said that he and many of his friends and relatives who also came to the United States from Guatemala learned to fish as children.
?I?ve been fishing all my life,? said Mr. Tejada, who is 40. ?And so has everyone in my family. It?s something we have always done together.?
Reply With Quote


eating, hudson, river, stripers

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Plundering Stripers Striperjim Stripers Forever 7 11-15-2011 08:17 AM
Patterns of migration in Hudson River striped bass as determined by otolith microchemistry archiver Hudson River 0 01-04-2010 12:22 PM
fly fishing for stripers on the Hudson River Larry Tumblin Stripers on the Fly 22 06-20-2008 07:52 PM
2008 - Hudson River Shad Regulations. Striperjim Hudson River 2 03-21-2008 02:20 AM
Hudson River Stripers? funnyman1969 Hudson River 2 05-11-2004 11:04 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2013 LLC
Affiliated Sites: